PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT6

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Ellen Mariani, on information, belief and established facts,

by and through her counsel of record, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, and for her causes of action against

all named and unnamed Defendants states the following:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

1. Plaintiff commenced this civil action on September 12, 2003, by filing of

Complaint with this Honorable Court. Since Plaintiff’s initial filing and the ‘firestorm”

surrounding Defendant GWB’s refusal to comply with the “911 Commission7,” this Amended

Complaint provides newly discovered substantial additional facts, evidence and voluntary

support from former federal employees and other concerned American Citizens who all seek

justice and the truth as to how and why the events of September 11, 2001, (hereinafter “911”),

occurred. Plaintiff hereby asserts Defendants, officially and individually are exclusively liable to

answer the Counts in this Complaint under the United States Constitution and provisions of the

18 U.S.C. § 1964(a) and (c), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (hereinafter

“RICO Act”) for “failing to act and prevent” the murder of Plaintiff’s husband, Louis Neil

Mariani, for financial and political reasons and have “obstructed justice” in the aftermath of said

criminal acts and omissions.8

2. On “911,” Plaintiff’s husband, Louis Neil Mariani, an American Citizen and

paying passenger on United Airlines Flight 175, was murdered by unidentified perpetrators,

(hereinafter “terrorists”) according to Defendant GWB.

continued...